ORAL AUDIT — gen_50_wage_seven_years_switched_bride
Live verifier run: 11 VERIFIED 0 FAILED 0 UNCHECKABLE — re-run:
python3 logic/solo_tools/verify_claims.py logic/oral_audit/manifests/gen_50_wage_seven_years_switched_bride_claims.jsonClaims manifest (verified live at render time)
| status | id | source | claim · evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| VERIFIED | G50-01 | Minchat Shai on Gen 29:18 ('אעבדך — no pashta on the bet') + Minchat Shai on Gen 28:15 (the banked twin: 'the Michlol cites a Jerusalem manuscript with hataf qamatz on the root's first letter, and likewise I-WILL-SERVE-YOU of the seven years — a great anomaly; and the Chizkuni wrote the BET in hataf qamatz') | THE WAGE-VERB AGAINST TWO ANOMALIES: אעבדך ('I will SERVE YOU seven years for Rachel,' 29:18) — the bet in plain qamatz (the long a), NOT the Chizkuni's hataf qamatz, and the root's first letter in the standard compound short e, NOT the Jerusalem manuscript's pointing that Minchat Shai calls a great anomaly; and exactly ONE pashta (the forward-leaning accent), on the final letter, none on the bet — his 29:18 ruling. The promise-verb twin banked at the Bethel unit lands here: SNAPSHOT sides with Minchat Shai at both stations. he=/ךָ֙ |
| VERIFIED | G50-02 | Minchat Shai on Gen 29:18 ('הקטנה — the nun dageshed') | THE YOUNGER AS RULED: הקטנה ('Rachel your daughter, THE YOUNGER,' 29:18 — the wage's own object-clause) — nun with dagesh (the doubling dot) per Minchat Shai, letter-identical. he=ָּֽה |
| VERIFIED | G50-03 | Minchat Shai on Gen 29:17 ('ועיני לאה רכות — Ibn Ezra reports Ben Efraim reading it as lacking an aleph, meaning LONG; his master forgives him — he lacked nothing but wisdom: the word stands as written, and the sages read it as the LONG-ENDURING gifts — priesthood, Levites, kingship; Bereshit Rabbah: Leah great in her gifts') + Kitzur Baal HaTurim on Gen 29:17 ('רכות — two: Leah's, and IF HE SPEAKS TO YOU SOFT WORDS') | THE TENDER EYES STAND AS WRITTEN: רכות ('and Leah's eyes were TENDER,' 29:17) — the Torah's ONLY token of the word, written with no aleph: Ben Efraim's emendation (read it 'long') is refuted by the letter itself, and the enduring-gifts derash rides the word as written; the Kitzur's soft-words pair (Job's) is outside the Torah, named. count=1 refs=['Gen 29:17'] |
| VERIFIED | G50-04 | Kitzur Baal HaTurim on Gen 29:17 ('ועיני at the head of a verse — three: Leah's tender eyes; and the EYES OF ISRAEL were heavy with age; and the eyes of the wicked shall fail — her eyes were tender fearing Esau, and Israel's eyes grew heavy seeing Jeroboam and Ahab in his line') | THE TWO VERSE-INITIAL EYES: ועיני ('and the eyes of...') opens a verse exactly TWICE in the Torah — Leah's tender eyes (29:17) and Israel's age-heavy eyes (48:10, the man Leah's fear did not marry, blessing her rival's grandsons); the Kitzur's third, the failing eyes of the wicked, is Writings-side, named. count=2 refs=['Gen 29:17', 'Gen 48:10'] |
| VERIFIED | G50-05 | Minchat Shai on Gen 29:21 ('הבה את אשתי — end-stressed') | THE DEMAND'S OWN STRESS: הבה ('GIVE my wife,' 29:21 — the Babel-imperative in one man's mouth) — end-stressed per Minchat Shai: the accent sits past the bet, on the final syllable; SNAPSHOT letter-identical. he=ָ֣/ה |
| VERIFIED | G50-06 | Minchat Shai on Gen 29:21 ('ואבואה — written FULL with vav, and all the rest in the Torah are lean') | THE ONE FULL LET-ME-COME: ואבואה ('that I may COME to her,' 29:21) — written plene with the vav, the form's only full token in the Torah as Minchat Shai rules: the purpose-clause of the demanded wedding is the Torah's one full-spelled coming. count=1 refs=['Gen 29:21'] |
| VERIFIED | G50-07 | Minchat Shai on Gen 29:25 ('זאת — the zayin dageshed') | THE ACCUSATION'S HARD ZAYIN: זאת in 'what is THIS you have done to me' (29:25 — the deceived-accuser formula arriving in Jacob's mouth) — zayin with dagesh (the doubling dot) after the joined what-word, exactly per Minchat Shai. he=ֹאת֙ |
| VERIFIED | G50-08 | Minchat Shai on Gen 29:27 + 29:30 ('גם — the gimel with dagesh', both notes) | THE ALSO OF THE SECOND BRIDE: גם in 'and he loved ALSO Rachel, more than Leah' (29:30) — gimel with dagesh (the doubling dot) and the maqqef (the joining stroke) binding it to its object, per Minchat Shai's twin notes here and at the counter-offer (29:27, likewise dageshed): the preference-formula's also-words are all hard. he=ַּֽם |
| VERIFIED | G50-09 | Minchat Shai on Gen 29:27 ('אשר — with galgal, not with maqqef') | THE UNJOINED SERVICE-CLAUSE: אשר in 'for the service WHICH you will serve with me' (29:27) — Minchat Shai rules it accented, not maqqef-joined; SNAPSHOT agrees on the testable half: no maqqef, an accent on the word. The accent's IDENTITY is the gap: he names galgal (the rare wheel-accent) and SNAPSHOT stores munach (the common sustaining accent) — the galgal layer remains uninstrumented in the stream (standing gap, first probed instance). maqqef_after=0 |
| VERIFIED | G50-10 | Minchat Shai on Gen 29:28 ('וימלא — the lamed in tzere') | THE FULFILLMENT AS RULED: וימלא ('and Jacob did so, and FULFILLED her week,' 29:28 — the compliance the machine popped on this root) — lamed dageshed in tzere (the long e) per Minchat Shai, letter-identical. he=ֵּ֖א |
| VERIFIED | G50-11 | Minchat Shai on Gen 29:28 ('את רחל בתו לו לאשה — in some books the word לו is absent; but in ALL the codices of Spain it is written, and so in the books of R. Meir and R. Gershom') | THE SECOND TO-HIM STANDS: 29:28 carries לו ('to him') TWICE — 'and he gave TO HIM Rachel his daughter, TO HIM as wife': some books drop the second; the codices of Spain and the books of R. Meir and R. Gershom keep it, and SNAPSHOT keeps both — arbitrating with Spain. (The doubled to-him lands on the verse that finally pops the give-my-wife demand: the letter says twice whose wife she is.) in-verse count=2 |
FOLDED INTO THE UNIT same day (one source of truth). Block 4 of the sixth run. Zero web fetches. Manifest: logic/oral_audit/manifests/gen_50_wage_seven_years_switched_bride_claims.json — 11 VERIFIED · 0 FAILED · 0 UNCHECKABLE (the run's first all-checkable manifest).
Sources: Minchat Shai on Gen 29:17-30 (chapter bank) · Kitzur Baal HaTurim on Gen 29:17 · span map (Bereshit Rabbah 70).
CROWNS (chain-attested + DB-verified)
- G50-01 the wage-verb against two anomalies: אעבדך ("I will SERVE YOU seven years for Rachel," 29:18) — bet in plain qamatz, NOT the Chizkuni's compound pointing; the root's first letter standard, NOT the Jerusalem manuscript's reading Minchat Shai calls "a great anomaly"; one pashta, on the final letter, none on the bet. The promise-verb twin banked at Bethel (28:15, "I will not leave you") lands: SNAPSHOT sides with Minchat Shai at both stations of his own cross-reference.
- G50-03 the tender eyes stand as written: רכות ("and Leah's eyes were TENDER," 29:17) — the Torah's ONLY token of the word, written with no aleph: Ben Efraim's emendation ("read it LONG") refuted by the letter itself — Minchat Shai: "he lacked nothing but wisdom" — while the enduring-gifts derash (priesthood, Levites, kingship) rides the word as written; the Kitzur's soft-words pair is Writings-side, named.
- G50-04 the two verse-initial eyes: ועיני ("and the eyes of...") opens a verse exactly TWICE in the Torah — Leah's tender eyes (29:17) and ISRAEL's age-heavy eyes (48:10): the woman who feared marrying Esau and the man her eyes feared for, grown old, blessing her rival's grandsons — the Kitzur's third (the failing eyes of the wicked) named, Writings-side.
- G50-05/06 the demand and its purpose, both marked: הבה ("GIVE my wife") end-stressed as ruled; ואבואה ("that I may COME to her") — the form's ONE full-spelled Torah token, per the rule "full with vav, all the rest lean": the demanded wedding carries the Torah's one full coming.
- G50-02/07/08/10 pointing as ruled: the-younger's dageshed nun (29:18); the accusation's hard zayin ("what is THIS you have done," 29:25 — the deceived-accuser formula in Jacob's mouth); the also-words of the double marriage dageshed and joined (29:27, 29:30); the fulfillment-verb's tzere lamed (29:28).
- G50-11 the second to-him stands: 29:28 carries לו ("to him") twice — some books drop the second; the codices of Spain and the books of R. Meir and R. Gershom keep it, and SNAPSHOT keeps both. The doubled to-him lands on the verse that finally pops the give-my-wife demand: the letter says twice whose wife she is.
DISCREPANCIES
None new against rulings. One accent-identity gap (below).
INSTRUMENT GAPS
- G50-09 the galgal question: אשר of the service-clause (29:27) — Minchat Shai rules "with galgal, not with maqqef" (the joining stroke). SNAPSHOT agrees on the testable half (no maqqef, an accent present) but stores munach (the common sustaining accent) where he names galgal (the rare wheel-accent): the galgal layer remains uninstrumented in the stream — first probed instance of the standing run-4 gap, now source-anchored.
READINGS FILED (named-only, unclaimed)
The Kitzur's linked eye-readings (Leah fearing Esau's lot; Israel's eyes heavy at Jeroboam and Ahab in his line) · the Bava Batra debate on the tender eyes (real tears, to her praise — she wept not to fall to Esau — against the enduring-gifts reading) · Bereshit Rabbah: "the elder Leah, great in her gifts."
TIMING + PROCESS NOTES
BLOCK CYCLE — see run log. Fourth consecutive zero-iteration verifier pass; first manifest of the run with no manual rows. Chapter-29 bank continues to gen_51 (the hated-full spelling war at 29:31, the meteg at 29:34, the lean stand-verb at 29:35, the Kitzur finals at 29:31-32).